Uploaded image for project: 'Content Types'
  1. Content Types
  2. MGNLCT-63

RichText type for contenttypes

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Major
    • 1.1
    • None
    • None
    • Yes
    • Yes
    • Features 7
    • 5

    Description

      As a developer I want to easily use RichText properties in my content-type based apps, so that I can provide the apps that my projects and customers require.

      Acceptance Criteria:

      • I can easily supply a RichText input field without needing to supply extra configuration in the app definition file or decoration

      Rationale:

      This is different then the existing "String" type because the data-type is fundamentally different than raw text (it stores HTML) and a developer retrieving the content must handle it so differently, and because where it is used is so different than a plain string of english - that it should be considered a completely different type. (As most (all?) of the other CMS does.) 

       

      Checklists

        Acceptance criteria

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

                sang.ngo Sang Ngo Huu
                czimmermann Christopher Zimmermann
                Votes:
                1 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                6 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                  Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:

                  Checklists

                    Task DoD

                    Time Tracking

                      Estimated:
                      Original Estimate - 2d
                      2d
                      Remaining:
                      Remaining Estimate - 0d
                      0d
                      Logged:
                      Time Spent - 1d 7h Time Not Required
                      1d 7h