-
Task
-
Resolution: Done
-
Neutral
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
-
Empty show more show less
-
Saigon 149
-
2
After the first implementation round, I gathered some feedback from UX which will be possibly tackled before releasing 6.0. The feedback refers to the status of RichTextField as of MGNLUI-4399.
- Priority 1: Icon sizes
- Mikaël Geljić: looks good from my view, the area is following the focus styles of text fields, the only things looking off are the two link icons which we'd needho to reexport in higher resolution from the new set, but details. Anja von Gunten: agree: focus styles (thumbs) / detail on icon sizes: the first 4 icons and "add table" look bigger than the rest
-
- Mikaël Geljić: looks good from my view, the area is following the focus styles of text fields, the only things looking off are the two link icons which we'd needho to reexport in higher resolution from the new set, but details. Anja von Gunten: agree: focus styles (thumbs) / detail on icon sizes: the first 4 icons and "add table" look bigger than the rest
Acceptance criteria
- is related to
-
MGNLUI-4399 Resurface field types: rich text field
-
- Closed
-
- relates to
-
-
- Closed
-
