-
Task
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Neutral
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
-
Empty show more show less
-
Empty show more show less
-
Yes
-
Features 6
-
1
Rationale:
"with-type" is not obvious which "type" is being referred to.
Acceptance criteria
- clones
-
MGNLUI-4948 Rename directive from "!with-type:" to "!content-type:"
- Closed
- is causing
-
MGNLUI-4953 DOC: Rename directive from "!with-type:" to "!content-type:"
- Closed
-
MGNLUI-5055 DOC: In DOCS57 rename !with-type to !content-type
- Closed
- is depended upon by
-
MGNLCT-101 DOC: in DOCS57 rename !with-type with !content-type
- Closed