[CONTEDIT-525] Content editor apps UI6 - block availability Created: 15/Mar/23 Updated: 02/Feb/24 Resolved: 02/Feb/24 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Content Editor |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | 2.1.6 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Neutral |
| Reporter: | Krystof Raiskub | Assignee: | Lam Nguyen Bao |
| Resolution: | Outdated | Votes: | 3 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | 0d | ||
| Time Spent: | 0.75d | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Template: | |||||||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||||||
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
||||||||||||
| Bug DoR: |
[ ]*
Steps to reproduce, expected, and actual results filled
[ ]*
Affected version filled
|
||||||||||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | AuthorX Support | ||||||||||||
| Team: | |||||||||||||
| Work Started: | |||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Hello, We are currently migrating our custom content editor apps from UI5 to UI6 syntax on the corporate website project, but we ran into the following issue - the block availability does not work as expected. In the block chooser dialog, we see all of the registered blocks from the whole project, even those which are meant to be used in other content-editor apps, etc. The expected behavior would be to show just those blocks defined in the app definition. For the following block field definition: blocks: $type:multiJcrBlock initialBlock:text defaultBlock:text blocks: - text - heading2 - code2 - ctaHorizontal2 - image - video_corp2 - html - quote2 - list2 - infobox - link - faq2 - table - line2 - lottie blocks: $type:multiJcrBlock initialBlock:text defaultBlock:text blocks: - text |
| Comments |
| Comment by Frank Sommer [ 20/Oct/23 ] |
|
Furthermore the title of the choose dialog shouldn't relate to the stories app. |
| Comment by Rainer Blumenthal [ 29/Jan/24 ] |
|
we urgently need this to be fixed plz |
| Comment by Lam Nguyen Bao [ 31/Jan/24 ] |
|
rgange the old behavior is that all the blocks are loaded, regardless the blocks are registered in other content apps. However, with the changes from https://jira.magnolia-cms.com/browse/CONTEDIT-552. The definitions are respected and loaded only defined blocks in app definition |