[DOCU-2003] Missing property in the advanced example leads to customer confusion Created: 04/May/20 Updated: 07/May/20 Resolved: 05/May/20 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Documentation |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Neutral |
| Reporter: | Jonathan Ayala | Assignee: | Martin Drápela |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
| Template: |
|
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
| Bug DoR: |
[ ]*
Steps to reproduce, expected, and actual results filled
[ ]*
Affected version filled
|
| Date of First Response: | |
| Epic Link: | 2020 mgnl-staff requests |
| Sprint: | Docu Sprint 79 |
| Story Points: | 0.5 |
| Description |
|
In the advanced example on how to Grant permissions to an app group there is a missing class property that must be set under /permissions@class with value info.magnolia.cms.security.operations.VoterBasedConfiguredAccessDefinition, otherwise, the example won't work. This should be updated for all the current supported versions 5.6+ |