[MAGNOLIA-1214] Activation only goes to 1 subscriber Created: 15/Nov/06 Updated: 13/Dec/06 Resolved: 01/Dec/06 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia |
| Component/s: | activation |
| Affects Version/s: | 3.0 RC4 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Art Peel | Assignee: | Sameer Charles |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 3 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
tomcat 5 on Windows XP Pro. |
||
| Attachments: |
|
| Template: |
|
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
| Bug DoR: |
[ ]*
Steps to reproduce, expected, and actual results filled
[ ]*
Affected version filled
|
| Date of First Response: |
| Description |
|
Through the config page, make sure there are two or more subscribers. Here is a patch for that: Index: SimpleSyndicator.java import org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils;
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Anthony Ogier [ 30/Nov/06 ] |
|
That patch worked for me. |
| Comment by Boris Kraft [ 01/Dec/06 ] |
|
Its a feature, not a bug. |
| Comment by Anthony Ogier [ 01/Dec/06 ] |
|
I'm sorry, but the feature was released by Magnolia Inc. on commit number 7281 and 7283 by "philipp" but is simply don't working at the moment... and there is just that little patch to apply to get the multi-subscribers feature ! |
| Comment by Sameer Charles [ 01/Dec/06 ] |
|
The problem with the multi subscriber activation is that its not easy to handle failover / transactions / incremental updates. In future we plan to implement better publishing control and that's one of the reason that it will be a part of enterprise edition and community I know we should have communicated this better. |
| Comment by Capitaine Harold [ 01/Dec/06 ] |
|
Hi Sameer, In my company, they have asked me to work on this feature. So I have already thinking about a way to do it. Is there anyone in magnolia that has already thinking about that? It would be interesting to share our point of views as I'm already working on it. Regards. |
| Comment by Sameer Charles [ 01/Dec/06 ] |
|
since its pluggable you can implement better syndication as a module. We do not have final decisions / specification what we will do for future enterprise edition, initially we wanted to go in a directiion Its great that your company agreed to contribute your work. I will recommend you to start this as a module so you are independent |
| Comment by Capitaine Harold [ 13/Dec/06 ] |
|
Hi Sameer, I've read the ICE specification 2.0, and it seems to be a good way to build the asynchronous communication system. So I've searched on internet and I've found only one implementation for the specification of ICE 2.0 called TwICE. Do you know another implementations? because TwICE is not really well documented but it seems to be really powerful. Regards, CAPITAINE Harold |
| Comment by Capitaine Harold [ 13/Dec/06 ] |
|
Back, I forgot to ask if you have an idea about another standard more recent compare to ICE that has been drafted 6 years ago. Regards, CAPITAINE Harold |