[MAGNOLIA-2929] Enhance unicode support Created: 05/Nov/09 Updated: 04/Nov/15 Resolved: 04/Nov/15 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia |
| Component/s: | core |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Magnolia International | Assignee: | Magnolia International |
| Resolution: | Won't Do | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | i18n, unicode | ||
| Σ Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified |
| Σ Time Spent: | Not Specified | Time Spent: | Not Specified |
| Σ Original Estimate: | Not Specified | Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sub-Tasks: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Template: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
In light of There are two sides to this issue:
Since "clients" tend to use one or the other form arbitrarily (Firefox 3.0 on MacOSX sends GET parameters in the NFD form, Safari in NFC; while the Linux OS tends to favor NFC and OSX tends to favor NFD, for instance). Node name normalization unfortunately requires using either Java 6 (java.text.Normalizer), the ICU4J library; there might be other implementations out there, so we should leave the option open to swap for another one. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_equivalence#Normal_forms for background information. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Magnolia International [ 09/Nov/09 ] |
|
The above has been done for 4.2; for actual support in AdminCentral, there's more work involved, which might not entirely possible before we have our new ui framework in place: |
| Comment by Michael Mühlebach [ 04/Nov/15 ] |
|
Given the thousands of other issues we have open that are more highly requested, we won't be able to address this issue in the foreseeable future. Instead we will focus on issues with a higher impact, and more votes. |