[MAGNOLIA-3458] Dialog checkboxSwitch not saved (i18n enabled) Created: 10/Dec/10  Updated: 09/Oct/12  Resolved: 20/Dec/10

Status: Closed
Project: Magnolia
Component/s: admininterface
Affects Version/s: 4.4.1
Fix Version/s: 4.3.9, 4.4.2, 4.5

Type: Bug Priority: Neutral
Reporter: Marco Glur Assignee: Ondrej Chytil
Resolution: Fixed Votes: 0
Labels: checkboxSwitch, dialog, i18n
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified
Environment:

http://demoauthor.magnolia-cms.com/demo-project/de/about/subsection-articles/ncaTest.html?mgnlCK=1291995819484
Local (Tomcat 6, Eclipse WTP, magnolia-empty-webapp)


Attachments: XML File config.modules.standard-templating-kit.dialogs.paragraphs.content.ncaDialog.xml    
Template:
Acceptance criteria:
Empty
Task DoD:
[ ]* Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]* Downstream builds green?
[ ]* Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]* Tests
[ ]* FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ]  Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
Bug DoR:
[ ]* Steps to reproduce, expected, and actual results filled
[ ]* Affected version filled
Date of First Response:

 Description   

When I add a new Paragraph (ncaTest) having a Dialog with two i18n-enabled checkboxSwitch controls, they just are set initially (on first save of the dialog) for each language and need to be set using the JCR browser afterwards. So, unchecking/checking the checkbox does not impact the JCR content AND the opening of the Dialog at a later time.

Problem was encountered in my local setup (Eclipse IDE) and could be reproduced on demoauthor:
http://demoauthor.magnolia-cms.com/demo-project/de/about/subsection-articles/

1. add new dialog (attachment ncaDialog.xml)
2. copy a paragraph and set its dialog to the new created from xml.
3. add paragraph to an area and edit, change values, save and check.



 Comments   
Comment by Magnolia International [ 17/Dec/10 ]

We'll try to push this in 4.4.2, sounds like an annoying bug.
Can anyone check if it also affects 4.3 ??

Comment by Ondrej Chytil [ 19/Dec/10 ]

Yes. It's reproducible in 4.3.8.

Generated at Mon Feb 12 03:46:41 CET 2024 using Jira 9.4.2#940002-sha1:46d1a51de284217efdcb32434eab47a99af2938b.