[MAGNOLIA-901] group groups Created: 29/May/06 Updated: 23/Jan/13 Resolved: 12/Jun/06 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia |
| Component/s: | admininterface |
| Affects Version/s: | 3.0 Beta 1 |
| Fix Version/s: | 3.0 RC1 |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Boris Kraft | Assignee: | Sameer Charles |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Template: |
|
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
| Date of First Response: |
| Description |
|
We should be able to add groups to groups, not only persons. Thats a common requirement for large installations (not a nice-to-have). |
| Comments |
| Comment by Philipp Bracher [ 29/May/06 ] |
|
It's quite easy to implement it in the dialogs. Sameer: shal I do it the same way as the group assignement by the users? |
| Comment by Sameer Charles [ 29/May/06 ] |
|
yes I guess that would be the best! |
| Comment by Sameer Charles [ 29/May/06 ] |
|
Philipp, some thought on this - 1- Do you think it makes sence to introduce special node types for User / Roles and Groups? it wont change much at the moment but already we could define these node types to auto create system specific properties needed.
what do you think? |
| Comment by Sameer Charles [ 29/May/06 ] |
|
also, referential integrity come for free with this! |
| Comment by Philipp Bracher [ 29/May/06 ] |
|
I don't have the time to do the changes for 3.0-rc1. Already to many issues ... I think we should restist to make any changes if it does not block anything for 3.0 But we should plan this for the 3.1 or 3.5 |
| Comment by Sameer Charles [ 12/Jun/06 ] |
|