[MGNLBACKUP-100] Test stability of RepositoryCopier implementation comprehensively Created: 26/Apr/16 Updated: 29/Mar/22 Resolved: 20/May/16 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Backup |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | 1.6.1 |
| Fix Version/s: | 2.0, 2.1 |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Ilgun Ilgun | Assignee: | Ilgun Ilgun |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | backup, restore | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | 0d | ||
| Time Spent: | 3d | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Template: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||||||||||
| Task DoR: |
Empty
|
||||||||||||||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | Basel 44 | ||||||||||||||||
| Story Points: | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
| Team: | |||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
This issue is addressing test-phase of new RepositoryCopier API used implementation of backup module which is done with Acceptance Criteria:
Findings;
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Vivian Steller [ 17/Nov/16 ] |
|
Great to hear there's a new Backup module! Question: did you try to recover the 3 GB backup using the same persistence manager setting also? Thanks! |