[MGNLEE-144] Installer fails with openwfe-1.7.2.1.jar permission denied Created: 05/Jun/09 Updated: 12/Jun/09 Resolved: 06/Jun/09 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia DX Core |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Boris Kraft | Assignee: | Magnolia International |
| Resolution: | Obsolete | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Template: |
|
||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
||||||||
| Bug DoR: |
[ ]*
Steps to reproduce, expected, and actual results filled
[ ]*
Affected version filled
|
||||||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||||||
| Description |
|
when launching the installer, it will eventually display the message openwfe-1.7.2.1.jar permission denied, see screenshot - so I can't install. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Magnolia International [ 05/Jun/09 ] |
|
do you get that systematically?? for this one specific file?? |
| Comment by Boris Kraft [ 05/Jun/09 ] |
|
Can't say because the installation does not continue after that message |
| Comment by Magnolia International [ 05/Jun/09 ] |
|
I mean systematically, i.e if you try again, do you get the same error for the same file ? |
| Comment by Boris Kraft [ 05/Jun/09 ] |
|
yes always the same error |
| Comment by Magnolia International [ 05/Jun/09 ] |
|
Did you have an installation in that same folder previously ?
would confirm this suspicion. Could it be that this other instance had different file permissions ? (a different user maybe?) |
| Comment by Boris Kraft [ 05/Jun/09 ] |
|
Greg, you are right, it seems this was the problem. Sorry for that. It tried to overwrite an existing previous installation. This might still be cause for concern though. |
| Comment by Magnolia International [ 05/Jun/09 ] |
|
Agreed, hence |
| Comment by Boris Kraft [ 06/Jun/09 ] |
|
I think thats a good solution. In real life deployment nobody would use the installer anyways |