[MGNLPN-336] Add switcher to wrap only personalized pages to improve performance Created: 23/Sep/16 Updated: 09/Feb/17 Resolved: 08/Nov/16 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia Personalization |
| Component/s: | Integration |
| Affects Version/s: | 1.2, 1.3 |
| Fix Version/s: | 1.2.8, 1.3.1, 1.4 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Jaroslav Simak | Assignee: | Robert Šiška |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Template: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Bug DoR: |
[ ]*
Steps to reproduce, expected, and actual results filled
[ ]*
Affected version filled
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Documentation update required: |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | Kromeriz 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Story Points: | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Until The optional switch wrapOnlyPersonalizedNodes is therefore added to /server/filters/cms/variantResolver. (default is false) |
| Comments |
| Comment by Evzen Fochr [ 08/Oct/16 ] |
|
Cannot find usage of personalization 1.3.1 |
| Comment by Evzen Fochr [ 10/Oct/16 ] |
|
rename not logically named variable hasPersonalizedVariant to wrapNode, functionality is ok. |
| Comment by Roman Kovařík [ 20/Oct/16 ] |
|
Reopened:
|
| Comment by Roman Kovařík [ 24/Oct/16 ] |
|
Resolved:
|
| Comment by Roman Kovařík [ 27/Oct/16 ] |
|
Closed: |
| Comment by Jan Haderka [ 01/Nov/16 ] |
|
Switching off the wrapping is not "solution", it's just a workaround as when switched off, the fix for We need to find solution that avoids |
| Comment by Roman Kovařík [ 12/Dec/16 ] |
Solved by |