[MGNLREST-286] Multivalue Composite Fields Using i18n Are Irretrievable With Rest Language Query Parameters Created: 13/Nov/20 Updated: 18/May/21 Resolved: 17/May/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia REST Framework |
| Component/s: | delivery |
| Affects Version/s: | 2.2.6 |
| Fix Version/s: | 2.2.7 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Neutral |
| Reporter: | Julian Nodarse | Assignee: | Canh Nguyen |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 1 |
| Labels: | VN-Analysis, VN-Implementation, headless-team-support | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | 2d 7h | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Template: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||||||||||
| Task DoD: |
[X]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[X]*
Downstream builds green?
[X]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[X]*
Tests
[X]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
||||||||||||||||
| Bug DoR: |
[X]*
Steps to reproduce, expected, and actual results filled
[X]*
Affected version filled
|
||||||||||||||||
| Release notes required: |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||
| Documentation update required: |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | Support | ||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | HL & LD 28 | ||||||||||||||||
| Story Points: | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
The content for the secondary languages is not returned when using a multivalue composite field. When specifying a language with the "lang" parameter in the rest call, the content for the language specified is not retrieved unless the language matches the fallbackLocale. Steps To Reproduce
Actual Result Expected Result Additional Notes Workaround |
| Comments |
| Comment by Christian Bordis [ 22/Feb/21 ] |
|
Hello viet.nguyen, is there "fixVersion" scheduled for this Bug? We did run into this issue in Magnolia v6.2.5 and this will cause a lot extra work. Thank You! |
| Comment by Canh Nguyen [ 17/May/21 ] |
|
Hi mdrapela, below is Robert's comment on the PR, I think we should update the document for MultiField type.
|