[MGNLRSSAGG-80] Generated aggregate Atom feed does not validate Created: 04/Apr/13 Updated: 06/Dec/13 Resolved: 07/May/13 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia RSS Aggregator Module |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | 1.4 |
| Fix Version/s: | 1.4 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Neutral |
| Reporter: | Zak Greant | Assignee: | Lars Fischer |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
| Template: |
|
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
| Bug DoR: |
[ ]*
Steps to reproduce, expected, and actual results filled
[ ]*
Affected version filled
|
| Date of First Response: |
| Description |
|
Feed not valid, according to W3C feed validator: |
| Comments |
| Comment by Lars Fischer [ 30/Apr/13 ] |
|
The feed is generated by a Java library - so we have to check if the problem is in the library or in the way the feed is created in code. |
| Comment by Lars Fischer [ 07/May/13 ] |
|
Files used for testing against the validator (shortened because only 150K allowed). |
| Comment by Lars Fischer [ 07/May/13 ] |
|
My tests showed that both the RSS 2.0 and Atom 1.0 feeds do now validate (see attached files). Service used was http://www.validome.org/rss-atom/ because the other feed validators must have public online access to the application. (But look at the feeds generated by Blogger: There seems to be not one single valid line, so I think ours should be more thank OK now). |
| Comment by Zak Greant [ 07/May/13 ] |
|
Thanks Lars! |