[MGNLSITE-29] Sites via YAML Created: 11/Aug/15 Updated: 13/Apr/21 Resolved: 09/Apr/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia Site Module |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 1.0.x |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Zdenek Skodik | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 3 |
| Labels: | support, to-specify | ||
| Σ Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified |
| Σ Time Spent: | Not Specified | Time Spent: | Not Specified |
| Σ Original Estimate: | Not Specified | Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sub-Tasks: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Template: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | YAML site definitions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Story Points: | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Since it's getting more and more popular, it'd be nice to extend the support also for things like site definitions or themes. This ticket was closed, as it is now possible to use YAML to provision sites. See: https://jira.magnolia-cms.com/browse/MAGNOLIA-6521 Creating a new ticket to handle an actual Site Registry: https://jira.magnolia-cms.com/browse/MGNLSITE-105 |
| Comments |
| Comment by Christopher Zimmermann [ 21/Jan/16 ] |
|
Split into another ticket about the themes - and therefore removed the story points estimation of 13 since scope changed. |
| Comment by Richard Unger [ 29/Jan/16 ] |
|
May I ask why there are seperate issues for YAML to Site, YAML to Theme, YAML to URI2RepositoryMapping, etc... ? Doesn't the fact that you have to create all these seperate issues already indicate that this probably isn't the right way to go? Or have I misunderstood something about these tickets? |
| Comment by Christopher Zimmermann [ 23/Feb/16 ] |
|
Based on discussion in Product Management & Product Development team alignment meeting: there are concerns to be addressed before agreeing to proceed on this ticket. In the meantime we move forwards with being able to define the site prototype via yaml. |
| Comment by Richard Gange [ 09/Apr/21 ] |
|
It is possible to do a site definition in YAML now. Decorate the config of the multisite module. |