[MGNLSTK-854] STK: event and news overview section headers should provide complete dialog with images Created: 17/Feb/12 Updated: 15/Mar/16 Resolved: 15/Mar/16 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia Standard Templating Kit (closed) |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | 2.0.1 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Natascha Desmarais | Assignee: | Tomáš Gregovský |
| Resolution: | Won't Do | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | dialog, events, events_overview, news, news_overview, sectionheader, stk | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||
| Template: |
|
||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||
| Task DoR: |
Empty
|
||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||
| Description |
|
Dialog: Might be worth fixing this for the 1.4 branch of STK as well if we release a 1.4.7 version. http://localhost:8080/magnoliaAuthor/demo-features/special-templates/glossary.html — — — |
| Comments |
| Comment by Espen Jervidalo [ 20/Feb/12 ] |
|
I am adding STK related issues from SCRUM-993 which is a mixup of page editor issues and STK issues. |
| Comment by Natascha Desmarais [ 21/Feb/12 ] |
|
Sorry, won't be able to do this since I'm attending the training this week. If you do fix it for 4.5, please clone this issue into STK so we don't forget to do it for the 1.4 branch as well - thanks! |
| Comment by Natascha Desmarais [ 22/Feb/12 ] |
|
Basic procedure to make sure our content is correct: double check with the prototype if the section header in question actually has pictures, if yes and the dialog does not provide it, simply add the two controls (image & imageLocation) to the specific dialog. If it does not contain an image, then the demo-project content needs an update. |
| Comment by Tomáš Gregovský [ 18/Oct/13 ] |
|
??http://localhost:8080/magnoliaAuthor/demo-features.html this two parts of issue I can't reproduce now. because of date where it was reported I would like to ask you @Nat for double check if they are still exist? thnx |
| Comment by Michael Mühlebach [ 15/Mar/16 ] |
|
Given the thousands of other issues we have open that are more highly requested, we won't be able to address this issue in the foreseeable future. Instead we will focus on issues with a higher impact, and more votes. |