[MGNLUI-199] If a group contains many apps, some of them are hidden Created: 22/Nov/12 Updated: 26/Nov/13 Resolved: 25/Nov/13 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia UI |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | 5.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Neutral |
| Reporter: | Federico Grilli | Assignee: | Aleksandr Pchelintcev |
| Resolution: | Obsolete | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | design | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Template: |
|
||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
||||||||
| Bug DoR: |
[ ]*
Steps to reproduce, expected, and actual results filled
[ ]*
Affected version filled
|
||||||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||||||
| Description |
|
If you have many apps in a (open or closed) group, apps are simply hidden after reaching the maximum number of apps in a group (8 for open groups, 9 for closed groups). |
| Comments |
| Comment by Andreas Weder [ 29/Nov/12 ] |
|
Lowering the priority. There is a designed solution for this, but for now, we just live with having a max of nine (closed groups) or eight (open groups) apps. I'll keep this on the radar for 5.0. |
| Comment by Andreas Weder [ 29/Nov/12 ] |
|
Added some more flesh to the issue bone. |
| Comment by Andreas Weder [ 29/Nov/12 ] |
|
I'm adding a screen shot illustrating how I'd like to handle this. The solution is actually comprised of two steps:
Please note the following:
In case this matters already: I actually want to show scroll bars for open groups eventually and if there are many of them. This is a simple, effective way to ensure the interface works in all circumstances and with all screen sizes. But that is a different topic. |
| Comment by Andreas Weder [ 29/Nov/12 ] |
|
I've described the designed solution. I don't think we necessarily have to implement this for 5.0, as it is not essential feature and there's a workaround for this (create more groups), but I we do have to solve this eventually. |
| Comment by Andreas Weder [ 29/Nov/12 ] |
|
Moving this to the maybe backlog as a nice-to-have. |