[MGNLUI-3617] Cross/Conditional Field Validation for Multi-Value and Composite Fields Created: 05/Oct/15 Updated: 03/Mar/16 Resolved: 03/Mar/16 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia UI |
| Component/s: | forms |
| Affects Version/s: | 5.4.2 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Critical |
| Reporter: | Avinash Palayadi | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Obsolete | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Template: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||||||||||
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
||||||||||||||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
We would need Cross/Conditional field validation of fields within a We would like to have capability of validating Field1 and Field2 based on custom conditions - one use case is either both fields should present or absent. 2. Composite Fields within a Multi-Value Field If we have a multi value field or a composite field within a multivalue field we would like to have conditional validations. MultiValueField.AddedSelectField1 (Drop-down field or Select field) We would like to validation MultiValueField.AddedSelectField2 not have the same value as MultiValueField.AddedSelectField1 Other Use case is MultiValueField.CompositeField.AddedField21 We would like to validation MultiValueField.CompositeField.AddedSelectField22 does not have the same value as MultiValueField.CompositeField.AddedSelectField12 |
| Comments |
| Comment by Richard Gange [ 07/Oct/15 ] |
|
Hi Avinash- Most likely this won't make in into the 5.4 product. However, on Cheers |
| Comment by Mikaël Geljić [ 03/Mar/16 ] |
|
While we acknowledge the importance of this feature, we intend to address it from this higher-level issue: MGNLUI-2542 (just rephrased it to "dynamic forms & cross-field validation", I collected similar requirements there too). |