[MGNLUI-3855] RichTextField required property not functioning properly Created: 21/Apr/16 Updated: 27/Jul/16 Resolved: 28/Apr/16 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia UI |
| Component/s: | widgets |
| Affects Version/s: | 5.4.5 |
| Fix Version/s: | 5.4.6 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Neutral |
| Reporter: | Federico Grilli | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Template: |
|
||||||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||||||
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
||||||||||||
| Bug DoR: |
[ ]*
Steps to reproduce, expected, and actual results filled
[ ]*
Affected version filled
|
||||||||||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||||||||||
| Description |
|
If i set to required: true, the "*" does not appear in the label. If the richtextfield is required: true, and if other field in the form failed the validation, this richtextfield, even if it has value, will show error. This only happens when you are creating the data. Updating the data will not encounter this issue. As reported by a user on our forum https://forum.magnolia-cms.com/forum/thread.html?threadId=8c6c0b0f-380d-4e91-be56-c7528856b5f6 and verified personally by yours truly. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Richard Gange [ 22/Apr/16 ] |
|
jenny_87 I've update the ticket to include both the issues you pointed you. Thanks for letting us know. |
| Comment by Jennylyn Sze [ 28/Apr/16 ] |
|
I updated today to 5.4.6, the two issues are both fixed already. It's weird though, I didnt see this in the release changes for 5.4.6 haha! But I'm happy that it's fix already, no need for me to wait for the next release Thanks! |
| Comment by Federico Grilli [ 28/Apr/16 ] |
|
Good to know! Evidently I tested it against 5.4.5 |