[MGNLUI-5966] Should be possible to use basic type names in definitions Created: 15/Jun/20  Updated: 05/Mar/21

Status: Open
Project: Magnolia UI
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Improvement Priority: Neutral
Reporter: Adam Siska Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Issue Links:
Problem/Incident
is caused by DOCU-2019 type must now be a fully qualified cl... Closed
Template:
Acceptance criteria:
Empty
Task DoD:
[ ]* Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]* Downstream builds green?
[ ]* Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]* Tests
[ ]* FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ]  Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
Documentation update required:
Yes
Epic Link: Simplify YAML configuration

 Description   

According this docu ticket: DOCU-2019 is should be possible to use type names instead of full class name of type in new definitions as it was possible in old ui framework.

i.e.

type: Long

instead of this:

type: java.lang.Long

Generated at Mon Feb 12 09:31:49 CET 2024 using Jira 9.4.2#940002-sha1:46d1a51de284217efdcb32434eab47a99af2938b.