[MLEARN-21] Upgrade to DL4J beta6 Created: 17/Dec/19 Updated: 20/Mar/20 Resolved: 18/Dec/19 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Machine Learning |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 1.1.2, 1.2 |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Neutral |
| Reporter: | Maxime Michel | Assignee: | Maxime Michel |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Template: |
|
||||||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||||||
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
||||||||||||
| Date of First Response: | |||||||||||||
| Description |
|
There was an earlier attempt to use beta5 in Meaning we currently run beta4, don't really benefit from beta6, but it would be nice to get the memory improvements advertised with beta5. They're not enough on their own but should help until beta7 comes out. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Julie Legendre [ 24/Feb/20 ] |
|
should this be mentioned in the release notes mmichel? |
| Comment by Maxime Michel [ 26/Feb/20 ] |
|
No, this doesn't have an impact any bigger than any other library upgrade as far as I'm concerned. The real work for this issue happened elsewhere. |