[MSHOP-101] Improve overall appearance of newly migrated Shop module Created: 14/Nov/13 Updated: 13/Jan/14 Resolved: 29/Nov/13 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Magnolia Shop (closed) |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | 2.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | 2.0 |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Andreas Weder | Assignee: | Jaroslav Simak |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | acceptance, ux | ||
| Σ Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified |
| Σ Time Spent: | Not Specified | Time Spent: | Not Specified |
| Σ Original Estimate: | Not Specified | Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
| Environment: |
Magnolia Module shop bundle 2.0 (snapshot: 20131112.114430-88) |
||
| Sub-Tasks: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Template: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
| Description |
|
I noticed during acceptance of the migrated Shop module that a lot of attention has gone into details such as naming actions in the Action Bar. The set of available features and how these work, in general, looks fine to me as well. The quality that has gone into the migration now puts more weight on missing elements such as icons and broken things such as overlong texts and broken tab layouts. The goal of this issue is to propose a set of improvements in order to elevate to fix this for 2.0 still. I see the potential to use this module as a demonstration of how you can leverage the new UI framework to extend Magnolia, and I think that by investing just a bit more, we have a good showcase here. |