[MTE-71] Simple MTK template demo Created: 11/Dec/15 Updated: 25/Mar/22 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | Magnolia Templating Essentials |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | Neutral |
| Reporter: | Christopher Zimmermann | Assignee: | Christopher Zimmermann |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Template: |
|
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
| Date of First Response: | |
| Story Points: | 8 |
| Description |
|
There should be a demo for MTK which demonstrate typical use cases for each page and component template included in the kit. Consider that this demo could eventually used for integration tests. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Christopher Zimmermann [ 13/Apr/16 ] |
|
Please include me in review. |
| Comment by Antti Hietala [ 03/Feb/17 ] |
|
Closing:
|
| Comment by Christopher Zimmermann [ 16/Feb/17 ] |
|
This will be very helpful for newcomers to Magnolia. Travel demo has a different purpose and does not offer clear overview of MTK. I have a draft version produced. For me the main outstanding question is how it should be delivered - I'm leaning towards another node at the root of the website tree. |
| Comment by Jan Haderka [ 17/Feb/17 ] |
|
git repo link of your draft? More detailed description of the functions/components it's demoing? (BTW IMO showing output of different ootb available functions has more value than showing components) Any research data on showing how many clients use MTK components vs. developing their own w/ more-less same functionality?
If it should be delivered, than definitively separate module w/ it's own independent page structure. Keep in mind that that for CE you can't have multiple sites, so ppl would need to choose to either install this or travel demo, while if installed on ee, it should come up w/ own site definition too. |
| Comment by Christopher Zimmermann [ 20/Mar/17 ] |
|
Agree that it should be own module. (Light module). An evaluator can have both travel demo and mtk demo installed and browse pages on author. (Even if they are not both actual sites.) |
| Comment by Christopher Zimmermann [ 20/Mar/17 ] |
|
Proposed mtk demo: https://git.magnolia-cms.com/users/czimmermann/repos/mtk-demo. |