[RESPDAM-90] "Original" request sometimes returns not original image but image with minHeight/minWidth Created: 07/Aug/23 Updated: 15/Aug/23 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | DAM Focal |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Neutral |
| Reporter: | Christoph Damm | Assignee: | Adrien Manzoni |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Template: |
|
| Acceptance criteria: |
Empty
|
| Task DoD: |
[ ]*
Doc/release notes changes? Comment present?
[ ]*
Downstream builds green?
[ ]*
Solution information and context easily available?
[ ]*
Tests
[ ]*
FixVersion filled and not yet released
[ ] 
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
|
| Bug DoR: |
[ ]*
Steps to reproduce, expected, and actual results filled
[ ]*
Affected version filled
|
| Date of First Response: | |
| Team: |
| Description |
|
Hello, I have a weird issue with focal points for one of our clients. sometimes not the original is returned but a way smaller image. Height and Width are actually matching the min definitions of the ones from the first variation.
Variation definition e.g.:
variations: !override
default:
description: 16x9 Standard
minHeight: 144
minWidth: 256
ratio: 16/9
allowedWidths:
- 256
- 426
- 640
- 848
- 958
- 1024
- 1262
- 1280
- 1600
Also: we have 2 public instances for that client, and we have cases where the image within one instance is returned fine, within the other one not. Deleting the image from the imaging workspace sometimes resolves the issue, however this can't be a permanent solution. We most likely will switch to not using the original anyways for other reasons, yet i have another issue with that (see RESPDAM-89), nevertheless wanted to log that issue here.
Regards, Christoph |
| Comments |
| Comment by Raphael Falvo [ 15/Aug/23 ] |
|
Hello chrisD , Could you please specify the version of Magnolia and the DAM Focal module in which you encountered this issue? |
| Comment by Christoph Damm [ 15/Aug/23 ] |
|
Hi, apologies. Magnolia 6.2.35 dx and dam focal 2.4.0. |
| Comment by Raphael Falvo [ 15/Aug/23 ] |
|
Hi chrisD
|