-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Neutral
-
5.3
-
None
Currently hard codes generic type to CompositeFieldDefinition in constructor, so it cannot be extended, and does not expose such definition typing correctly to subclasses (declares "new" standalone generic type extending FieldDefinition).
Additionally, would be good to use interface type for FieldDefinition in AbstractCustomMultiField#createLocalField(...), so that we don't have to cast in subclasses without a reason to.
Acceptance criteria
- is depended upon by
-
MGNLPN-179 Cannot edit visitor trait on existing persona
- Closed