-
Story
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Neutral
-
None
-
6.2.15
-
None
As a project developer, I want to model content with file/binary properties so that editors can add images to content entries without leaving the form.
ACs
- support multiple concurrent fields with arbitrary property names
- do not require complex configuration or custom code (save action, item resolution strategies)
- support delivery with facilities to resolve links to those binaries
- offer a clear content-type property type and/or a clear, non-deprecated field-definition to configure such properties and editing experience
- resolve confusion about upload-field (deprecated) vs. DAM upload-field (not deprecated, also unintuitively doesn't upload to dam) vs. link fields.
- be usable in dam workspace without further linking (see SUPPORT-13193)
Technical points
- $type: uploadField definition has been deprecated since 6.2.4, see Upload field and DAM upload field; caution blocks in both pages advise "not to use" these definitions in certain context, without explaining why.
- We currently go through interesting gymnastics to cover our internal usage:
While damUploadField is not deprecated, it is no longer annotated as a field type
—which doesn’t prevent actual usage, just makes it uglier, see this.
- we are free to upload to DAM behind the scenes if we feel like, and as long as developer and author experience do not suffer from this.
Acceptance criteria
- is caused by
-
MGNLUI-5886 2 or more UploadFields cannot be used in the same App or Dialog
- Closed
- relates to
-
MGNLUI-6991 Cannot Delete An Asset From a DAM Upload Field
- Closed
-
MGNLUI-6215 DOC: Restructure uploadField documentation
- Closed